Way back in September 2009 I blogged about newspapers charging for content. In March of this year, the New York Times implemented a “paywall” – unless you were a subscriber, your access was limited to twenty articles a month.
I decided to put my money where my mouth was and subscribe. As I said in 2009, I don’t mind paying for something when it’s worth paying for, and I want the traditional newspapers to survive. You don’t get decent reporting for nothing; those people have to be paid and those of us who consume their product should pay for it. So in March I signed up for an electronic subscription to the New York Times for $10.50 a month. That was about the upper limit of what I was willing to pay, but I felt that it was worth it.
In September, the subscription went up to $12.75. I wasn’t happy – especially that I got no notice of or explanation for the increase – but I left things alone.
This month the bill came in for $15. Again, no explanation or warning. That was above my threshold. So I went to their web site to cancel my subscription. I logged in, found the “cancel my subscription” link, and clicked on it. I was presented with a blank screen. I tried different routes through the web site and experienced the same behavior. So I went back to the original documentation, used that URL, and was treated to a 404 – page not found.
At this point I decided to try one last tactic and I accessed the page using Internet Explorer on a Microsoft platform. This time I didn’t see a blank screen – instead, one that told me that if I wanted to cancel my subscription I had to do it by telephone.
So I called the number. When I explained that $15 a month was above my threshold for the value of the New York Times, the customer service representative offered to drop my rate to $7.50 a month. I declined. I feel that that is an unethical business practice.
But here’s the bottom line: If you have an online subscription to the New York Times and you call their customer service and threaten to cancel it, you can get your rate cut in half.
I remain convinced that the only way that traditional newspapers will survive is by charging for online access. But not this way.
Mundane life from rural Minnesota.
Friday, December 2, 2011
To the New York Times: You blew it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment